Bowie photo copyright infringement

 

 

Rosana Prada says she has the copyright in this Bowie image and allows me to use it under creative commons: I have not modified it

 

Here’s a true story about copyright: it shows how careful we all need to be. A hospitality company suddenly gets an email from ImageRights International, a US copyright agency, asking for £1,700.

The agency says it has found a picture of the interior of one of the hospitality company’s joints which has the famous Bowie image of him with a flash over his eye and with red hair. The Aladdin Sane picture of 1963. And, no, I am not going to include it in this blog because I don’t want to play the agency £1,700 for the rights of this Brian Duffy picture. But there is a photo of Bowie above which a photographer says is in the creative commons. I hope she is right.

Bowie image used to advertise joint

Visitors to the joint had their photo taken in front of the image which had been painted on a wall. The hospitality company used the photo on its own website to advertise the joint. This is what the agency saw: it checked its files and found no rights contract between them and the joint. Hence the email.

But the hospitality company had not painted the image: its agent, an interior design company, had. The interior designers liked the image, easily got a copy and up it went.

The joint’s owners paid up

The hospitality company knows the copyright law because we at ContentETC had done a session on it. But the interior designers did not. Yes, the hospitality company had to pay up.

The lessons of this story: do you and the staff of your agents know the copyright law and how easy it is to infringe it? Do you or they realise how long the arm of a copyright agency is?

Invest £19.99 and save the hassle

Here’s the advert: all you need to do is invest £19.99 in ContentETC’s elearning copyright course to save yourself the hassle.

But, you may say: I can see hundreds of copies of that image and other by Duffy all across the internet. Not all of them can have paid royalties.

And you are right: lots of them didn’t. But then do you want to play Russian roulette with a US copyrights agency?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *